|
Hi Reader, Once, I was handed a slide deck. A marketer at an agency had built it in Canva as reference material for the brand audit package I was putting together. It was tidy enough. It also could have belonged to anyone, and in a way it did. Even though the colours had been swapped out, the fonts adjusted, the content dropped in, something was missing. The thinking that makes design actually work for a specific organization, a specific community, a specific message, wasn't there. It couldn't be. That's just not what a template is for. When “just use Canva” becomes the whole strategyThis is a newer problem. In years past I've been handed a logo sketched on a napkin, or built in PowerPoint—I am, regrettably, not joking about the PowerPoint. The ask was always the same: can you work with this? I don't take projects like that anymore, so: no. But at least everyone in the room knew what that was. A starting point. Something that needed work. The Canva deck was different. It had been assembled into something that could read as finished, which made it harder to explain why it wasn't working, and harder still to justify starting over. You can't. Not well, anyway. Canva is a genuinely useful tool for people who already kind of know, sorta what to do. It's fast, it's accessible, it removes a real barrier. What tools like this can't do is know your community, understand what your organization is trying to say, or catch that the template you picked sends a signal you didn't intend. It won't notice that the font pairing looks like someone without typography know-how chose it based on ✨VIBES✨, or that the contrast ratio wouldn't pass WCAG so your content is inaccessible. A tool has no meaningful relationship with context. But design thinking does. So how did we get here?The deeper issue is what the tool was supposed to solve. Look at what nonprofit communications roles are actually asking for right now. A single coordinator posting might require graphic design, short-form video production, web management, email marketing, photography, and social strategy, plus three to five years of experience doing all of it. The scope of that role belongs to an entire department, and the salary rarely reflects even one of those specializations. Canva (or Creative Cloud, or fill in the blank AI model, or...) got handed to the person living inside that situation as a consolation prize. Next month: what changes when the right person is doing the right work.Rooting you on,
P.S. If this resonated with you, here are three ways you can let me know:
About Reesa |
For nonprofits and social enterprises whose work runs deeper than their marketing lets on. If your team is doing it all, this is for you: accessible, practical, occasionally weird monthly dispatches featuring accessibility-focused design ideas and fixes. Stuff you can use now, freebies when I've got them, and the occasional rant about the sector's bad habits. So the communities you serve can actually see themselves in your mission, and engage.
There's a project every organization has and nobody wants to start. Starting means choosing one problem over five others, spending money you're not sure you can justify, and hoping you've picked the thing that will actually make a difference. Sound familiar? The website has been "good enough" for three years. The donation form works, technically, if you have the patience of someone who really, really wants to give you money. The brand works for funders but it doesn’t speak to your community....
Hey Reader, You know that moment in school when the teacher is looking to call on someone and you quickly avert your eyes? In the social sector, design work has a way of looking like it fell on the desk of whoever didn't look away in time. They weren't quite prepared, and their brain definitely wants to be somewhere else. Still, the need is real, the deadline is looming, the tools to make it happen exist, and someone is close enough to it to push some pixels around. So something gets made,...
Hi Reader, Who's really paying for the fixes you keep postponing? I was reviewing a donation flow for an organization doing genuinely important work when I discovered who was really paying for the fixes they'd been postponing. Imagine yourself in this donor's position: would you jump through all the hoops, or would you give up instead? The problems weren't huge individually, just default settings and assumptions no one questioned. Compounded, they turned what should have been simple into...